Quick Contact Site Map Disclaimer
Lee Smart Logo
Home
Our Firm
Areas of Practice
Attorneys
 
Resources
Clients
 
Contact Us
Overview Career Opportunities Newsletter
 


Hostile workplace is basis for ADA claim

The Supreme Court disagreed and affirmed the trial court’s judgment. The Robel Court noted that "whether the antidiscrimination statute supports a disability-based hostile work environment claim is an issue of first impression in this state." Thus the Court looked to federal cases that interpreted analogous federal anti-discrimination statutes. Several federal courts interpreted language of Title VII of the federal Civil Rights Act that resembled the WLAD and held that disability-based hostile-work-environment claims were legally permissible.

The Robel Court held that the WLAD was analogous to Title VII and to existing Washington law permitting hostile-work-environment claims based on sex discrimination. The Court expressly extended the WLAD to include such claims where the discrimination was based on the claimant’s disability.

To prove such a claim, a claimant must show that (1) she was disabled within the meaning of the WLAD, (2) the harassment was unwelcome, (3) the harassment resulted from the disability, (4) the harassment affected employment conditions, and (5) it was imputable to the employer.

Fred Meyer also appealed the trial court’s finding that it had committed intentional infliction of emotional distress, or the tort of outrage. The Court of Appeals concluded that proof of that claim was deficient, but the Supreme Court reversed. The test of such a claim is whether the defendant’s conduct was "beyond all possible bounds of decency" and "atrocious and utterly intolerable in a civilized community." A trial court reasonably could find that this standard, while "admittedly very high," was met here, "in light of the severity and context of the conduct" by Robel’s co-workers.

<< Previous  

 


The Lee Smart Quarterly is a publication of the law offices of Lee, Smart, Cook, Martin & Patterson, P.S., Inc. for clients and others. It is intended as general information only and is not to be construed as legal advice. You should consult an attorney if you have any specific legal questions.

Editor: Jeffrey P. Downer Eml: jpd@leesmart.com
Phone: 206.621.3482 Toll Free: 877.624.7990

   

 


Hostile workplace is basis for ADA claim
Class plaintiffs must prove individual damage claims
School is strictly liable as 'manufacturer' of lunch
Around The Firm
Archived Issues

Print This Issue

 

   
 
Copyright