| |

Around The Firm
Joel E. Wright and Stacy
D. Heard prevailed before Division One of the Court of Appeals
in the legal malpractice case, Berry v. Fleury. Joel and Stacy had
won partial summary judgment of dismissals in Superior Court, and
plaintiff appealed. Plaintiff claimed that his former attorney in
a family law case violated the Consumer Protection Act. Plaintiff
also claimed that he suffered emotional distress, business losses,
and alienation of his children. The Court of Appeals affirmed the
Superior Court’s dismissals of plaintiff’s claims.
Francis X. Olding won
at trial in Haynes v. Calvert, a boundary dispute. A survey taken
by the defendant showed a discrepancy between the survey and the
existing boundary fence. After the defendant tried to move the boundary
fence by force, Frank sued, won a restraining order, and proceeded
to trial. Before trial, Frank defeated defendant’s motion
for dismissal, in which defendant claimed that that the land belonged
to the Muckleshoot Tribe and that the court lacked jurisdiction.
At trial, Frank used ancient county records and other evidence,
including a site visit by the judge, to prove the recognized boundary.
The court ruled in favor of Frank’s client, ordered the defendant
ejected from the land, quieted title in favor of plaintiff and awarded
damages for the defendant’s improper occupation of the land.
… Michelle A. Corsi has won
victories in a pair of real estate malpractice actions. In Colberg
v. Windermere, the plaintiff home buyer sued for nondisclosure of
defects in the septic system. Michelle successfully moved for summary
judgment because her client, the listing agent, had no knowledge
of such defects. And in LaWall v. Home Realty, the plaintiff property
buyers sued for a variety of defects in the home. The court granted
partial summary judgment to Michelle’s client, agreeing that
the real estate agent was not liable for failure to disclose.
Kenneth E. Hepworth
successfully defended claims brought against an excavation contractor
in Leland Hyatt Const. v. Port of Sunnyside v. Sunnyside Valley
Irr. Dist. The lawsuit arose out of the Sunnyside Municipal Airport
Runway Safety Project. The Port of Sunnyside hired Sunnyside Valley
Irrigation District to lay 1,400 feet of 54-inch pipe in a ditch.
The Port later hired Hyatt to backfill the ditch to grade. After
the work was completed, the Port learned that 160 feet of the pipe
had collapsed. Hyatt had to sue to collect the balance due under
its contract with the Port. The Port counterclaimed that Hyatt breached
its contract with the Port by failing to properly backfill and compact
the ditch, resulting in the damage to the pipe. The Port also brought
a third-party complaint against the Irrigation District. The jury
agreed with Ken that the pipe collapsed due to the conduct of the
Irrigation District, not Hyatt. … Ken Hepworth also won in
Beckett v. Demopolis. Ken’s client, a lawyer, sued his former
client to collect unpaid legal fees. The ex-client counterclaimed
for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and professional
negligence. The court agreed with Ken that there was no merit to
any of the counterclaims and dismissed them with prejudice on summary
judgment.
| The Lee
Smart Quarterly is a publication of the law offices of Lee, Smart, Cook,
Martin & Patterson, P.S., Inc. for clients and others. It is intended
as general information only and is not to be construed as legal advice.
You should consult an attorney if you have any specific legal questions.
|
| Editor:
Jeffrey P. Downer |
Eml:
jpd@leesmart.com
|
| Phone:
206.621.3482 |
Toll
Free: 877.624.7990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|