| |

Around The Firm
(Continued - Page 2)
William L. Cameron won
summary judgment of dismissal of Richard v. Trendwest, a federal
racial-discrimination action. Plaintiffs alleged that management
at Trendwest’s furniture plant in Tacoma was slow to act on
misconduct of some employees, including a failure to remove racist
graffiti from the men’s room. Bill argued that plaintiffs’
declaration testimony to that effect was not enough to show a genuine
issue for trial. The federal court agreed and dismissed the action.
… Stacy D. Heard won summary
judgment in Kirtley v. Stowell, a legal-malpractice action. In the
underlying child-custody case, the child’s grandmother had
had custody of the child for several years but lost it to the mother.
The grandmother then sued her own lawyer, as well as the opposing
lawyer, whom Stacy defended, and other professionals, alleging that
they conspired to deprive her of her due-process rights. The court
dismissed the claim against Stacy’s client and awarded attorney
fees.
Jennifer M. Ilenstine
won the trial of English v. Hendren. Jennifer’s clients, the
Hendrens, had rented a Budget truck to move from Camano to Bainbridge
Island. Mr. Hendren’s friend was driving the truck and parked
it at the top of a hill. Later, without warning, it rolled downhill
while friends were loading it, crashing into plaintiff’s garage
and hitting a car. The Hendrens later learned that Budget routinely
loosened emergency brakes to make them easy to set, and usually
provided chocks but failed to do so for this truck. The judge agreed
with Jennifer that even though the truck would not have rolled absent
negligence, Mr. Hendren was not the negligent party since he had
never driven the truck, was not responsible for securing it, and
had no reason to suspect that the truck would roll. … Michelle
A. Corsi won the trial of Nielsen v. Solid Trading v. Sun
Mark Realty. Sun Mark acted as dual real estate agent in Solid’s
sale of 40 acres to Nielsen, a logging company. Nielsen sued Solid
for failing to return closing papers in time for closing, as the
purchase and sale agreement required. Solid then sued Sun Mark,
claiming that it had breached fiduciary duties by failing to inform
Solid of pending logging regulations that would affect the amount
of timber that Nielsen could harvest. The court dismissed the claims
against Sun Mark, finding that it had nothing to do with Solid’s
failure to return the closing papers, and awarded Michelle’s
clients $50,000 in attorney fees pursuant to the purchase and sale
agreement.
| The Lee
Smart Quarterly is a publication of the law offices of Lee, Smart, Cook,
Martin & Patterson, P.S., Inc. for clients and others. It is intended
as general information only and is not to be construed as legal advice.
You should consult an attorney if you have any specific legal questions.
|
| Editor:
Jeffrey P. Downer |
Eml:
jpd@leesmart.com
|
| Phone:
206.621.3482 |
Toll
Free: 877.624.7990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|