Quick Contact Site Map Disclaimer
Lee Smart Logo
Home
Our Firm
Areas of Practice
Attorneys
Resources
Clients
Contact Us
Overview Career Opportunities Newsletter
 


6-year statute bars contractor indemnity

Freeman moved for summary judgment based on the six-year statute of repose and the six-year statute of limitations for claims based on written contracts. The trial court granted the motion, dismissing all of Ledcor’s claims against Freeman because its settlement with Parkridge occurred more than six years after substantial completion. Ledcor appealed.

The Ledcor court affirmed dismissal of the indemnity claims. The court rejected Ledcor’s argument that the claims for written and equitable indemnity were beyond the scope of the statute. The court ruled that claims for contractual indemnity in construction do "arise from" construction and therefore fall within the scope of the statute. The Court of Appeals also ruled that the claims "accrued" not when Parkridge sued Ledcor but when Ledcor later paid money in settlement of the claims against it.
Ledcor did not settle with Parkridge until a few weeks after the statute of repose expired on December 5, 2000. Thus, the court ruled that the statute of repose barred Ledcor’s contractual and equitable indemnity claims against Freeman.

However, Ledcor did win reversal of the trial court’s dismissal of its claims against Freeman for breach of contract arising out of construction defects. Citing its recent decision in Architechtonics Construction Management, Inc. v. Khorram, 111 Wn. App. 725 (2002), the Court of Appeals ruled that the statute of limitations for contractual construction-defect claims begins to run when a party knows, or reasonably should know, of the other party’s breach. Thus, applying this discovery rule to Ledcor’s claims, the court ruled that issues of fact as to when Ledcor knew or should have known of Freeman’s alleged defective work precluded summary judgment on that claim.

<< Previous  

 


The Lee Smart Quarterly is a publication of the law offices of Lee, Smart, Cook, Martin & Patterson, P.S., Inc. for clients and others. It is intended as general information only and is not to be construed as legal advice. You should consult an attorney if you have any specific legal questions.

Editor: Jeffrey P. Downer Eml: jpd@leesmart.com
Phone: 206.621.3482 Toll Free: 877.624.7990

   

 


6-year statute bars contractor indemnity
More bad news for insurers on consent judgments
Employer liable for tax effect of damages
Around The Firm
Archived Issues

Print This Issue

 

   
 
Copyright